Forest Fires and Life Decisions
What decision do you
think has the most impact on your ability to be a competent person?
Competency means to
perform at a high level. To be a
competent chess player, a person must consistently make good moves without many
mistakes.
But life is full of
mistakes. We make them any time we act
or think selfishly. How can we ever hope
to be truly competent at what matters most when we exhibit that type of
behavior so frequently?
I was a Psychology
undergraduate at BYU, but one of the discipline's ideas that has stuck with me
the most came from a class of the same subject that I took in high school.
When people
discover a disparity between their actions and standards, the realization
creates cognitive dissonance, a fancy term for internal stress or
conflict. In order to resolve the
discrepancy, a person typically responds by either elevating their behavior to
meet the standard or dropping their standards to meet the behavior.
That concept sounds
simple enough, but it lies at the very core of the conflict between excellence
and mediocrity. In fact, misunderstanding or self-deception about the effect of
cognitive dissonance is a principle reason why some people don't reach their
potential.
When a person reduces
their standards to the level of their behavior, they use a reason to justify it. For example, when they discover that they are going faster than the speed limit they might think, "Everyone else is going faster than I am,"
"I'm in a hurry and it would be rude to be late," or "Police
officers don't care if I'm only going two over." While a solitary infraction may not seem
serious, every decision we make, even the small ones, play a role in building
or eroding our character.
The decision to take
the moral high road fosters integrity, but the choice to change rather than rationalize
our behavior when we make mistakes determines whether or not we will keep it.
In other words, it
determines whether or not we reach our potential.
Some people think that
the mistakes they have made mean that they have already lost the opportunity to
become what they could have been.
When wildfires burn prominent
sections of forest, seemingly identical landscapes can exhibit marked
differences in the speed of their recovery.
One of the most important factors that determines how soon new growth will begin is the accessibility of new seeds.
The sooner that seeds can penetrate the desolate soil, the faster healing can occur.
Even after an area
scathed by fire recovers, it is never exactly the same again. At the same time, it isn't necessarily inferior
to how it was before it was burned. Overcoming
the aftermath of a wildfire is painful and undesirable compared to avoiding the
fire in the first place, but the damage doesn't destroy the potential that the
landscape has for incredible beauty.
Why?
Because its potential
for excellence is part of its nature.
And no amount of fire can ever take that away.
What a tragedy it would
be if the forest, devastated by its loss, put off gathering new seeds and
instead chose to wallow in its charred branches, weeping at the open sky? Or decided that it was ok to be an empty
wasteland after all?
The only way it will ever be green and lush and beautiful again is by reversing its life course and starting to plant new seeds.
On that choice hangs
its destiny.
If you would like to stay updated on my posts, you can subscribe and/or like The Modest Miracle's Facebook page.
Photo attribution: Nicholas A. Tonelli, "Burns Run Wild area (11), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Comments
Post a Comment